We have a vast collection of images here which have been shared over the years ...

Click on an image to see the discussions around the piece.

Enjoy!

cuffs enameled Uzbek front

Enamel cuffs Uzbekistan ? late 19th c
Read more…
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

Comments

  • Soooooo beautiful!!  you collected the very best items ever seen!!
  • Thanks but actually I have mostly sold the best items.  I can not post most of the best things as they are from one particular collection. I have most of the images in transparencies.  I managed to keep a few really nice examples of certain groups I sold alot of.  I love this enamel group of jewelry.
  • I guess jewelry always comes down with personal taste, some like it big and bold and others small and simple.  Just keep some of them for yourself if you can.
  • most of my clients like big and bold since that's what I have and like. I'm not much for more delicate stuff or smaller size things.
  • Guess that's why I just love all your items.....plus they are very special!  Looking forward to my new necklace already!
  • I would think that if the other - rather more flamboyant - pair is Uzbekistan, then these are two. I personally find these "easier" on the eye, and remember I have by now seen them several times and enjoyed them: also posted them on FB when I placed a  whole swag of your pieces there, quite some time ago, using photos you sent me. The others are "richer", but also "busier", and to me a bit overpowering - again, I have to stress that this is a personal thing. These fully do please me. And I do thank you for your plentiful posting!
  • I should explain that I have nothing against big and bold things, by the way - far from it. It is more a matter of how things are done, no matter whether they are big or small. And in many cases, Linda, I like the same big and bold things as you. In some cases, your taste veers rather more towards the "baroque" (that's probably the best catch-all word) than mine. And this may ultimately even be a cultural difference, in terms of our origins, than just a personal matter. Hard to say. But it is an observable difference. We would agree, I think, in no less than 80% of cases on what we find beautiful - probably even more!
  • I now think that these are almost certainly Russian, made for clients in Bukhara.
  • Ah, I see that by July 2011 I had arrived at what I now think is pretty much the right conclusion. These were, I think, likely enough made in Russia itself, but the Caucasus is certainly also a possibility. I think they MAY have been made for clients in Bukhara but am no longer sure of that, even. In other words, I think it is possible that these have nothing whatever to do with Uzbekistan/Bukhara at all.

  • I don't know yet where these were made or worn but I have not to date seen one photo of anyone in any old photos with them. and or no books on any Caucasian jewelry have this style shape. Remember there is a bump group that is the same as this with the same granulated surface as the belt and ring posted. I think this shape was made with differing surfaces but used and worn where is still a mystery.  I have not seen in even places like Kazan and Tartar areas where again Russan enameling on jewelry was used. again different shapes on bracelets and palette of colors differed.

This reply was deleted.

You need to be a member of Ethnic Jewels to add comments!

Join Ethnic Jewels

Request your copy of our newsletter.

If you would like to receive our newsletter

Click here